HEADLINES

  • Anambra 2017: Some parties have set a lot of money aside to pay for votes - APDA
  • Credibility of elections in Nigeria depends on credibility of Voter Register - INEC
  • 2015: Jonathan is a man of the state, he puts Nigeria's interest before his own - EU
  • Nigeria needs a strong PDP as APC has failed the nation - Dickson
  • Osinbajo begins two-day working visit to Indonesia as Buhari returns home
  • Buhari's visit to Turkey met its desired objectives - Presidency

News

CCT has given judgment, whether it is fair or not, only history will tell - Civil Societies
CCT has given judgment, whether it is fair or not, only history will tell - Civil Societies

Partner for Electoral Reform, a Civil Society Organisation (CSO), said Senate President, Bukola Saraki’s victory at the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) was a setback to the anti-corruption fight .

Saraki, who had been on trial over allegation of false declaration of assets, was discharged and acquitted of the charges by the tribunal on Wednesday in Abuja.

Chairman of the CSO, Ezenwa Nwagwu, told the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) in Abuja that the judgment ought to be otherwise following the weight of the allegations against the Senate President.

“The CCT has given its judgment, so whether it is fair or not only history will be able to tell that later.

“However, i maintain that Saraki’s victory is a painful drawback on the nation’s fight against corruption because the judgment should have been otherwise.’’

Frank Tietie, Executive Director of the Citizens Advocacy for Social and Economic Rights (CASER), also told NAN that incompetent and peripheral prosecution had grossly weakened the fight against corruption in Nigeria.

“This is another sad case where the incompetence of the prosecution has again corroborated the claim that prosecution agencies in Nigeria are not diligent in the process of investigating cases of corruption.

“They make wild allegations without the requisite knowledge of criminal procedure and the application of the rules of evidence.

“The norm of the prosecution in Nigeria today is either for the police or prosecuting agencies like EFCC and ICPC to make arrests and thereafter shop for prosecution.

“It could also be that they rush to court without proper evaluation of the evidence, whether it can lead to conviction,’’ he said.

Tietie added that it was also possible that the prosecution did not have anything incriminating against Saraki in the first instance but had only sought to harass him with politically motivated charges.

Jun 14, 2017

0 

comment









Comment Title :

Your Name :

Comment :

RECENT POSTS
GALLERY
  • Anambra 2017: Some parties have set a lot
  • Credibility of elections in Nigeria depend
  • 2015: Jonathan is a man of the state, he p
  • Nigeria needs a strong PDP as APC has fail
  • Osinbajo begins two-day working visit to I
  • Buhari's visit to Turkey met its desired o
  • Buhari orders Minister to convene summit o
  • We can't have a Military that will inject
  • We bombed and neutralised Boko Haram gathe