The Federal High Court, Abuja, has fixed September 11 to deliver judgment in the suit filed by Dino Melaye (APC- Kogi), challenging his planned recall by some voters in his constituency.
Justice Nnamdi Dimgba, fixed the September date after listening to arguments from all parties involved in the suit.
The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) had commenced the process to recall Melaye, but the Senator went to court, seeking stoppage of the process.
One of the grounds upon which Melaye, who represents Kogi West in the Senate challenged his recall, was that the signatures of some of the voters in the petition for his recall were fictitious.
Melaye who argued his case through his counsel, Nkem Okoro, said that majority of the signatures on the petition were dead people.
He added that death certificates were attached to the processes he filed as exhibits to ascertain the veracity of his claim that some of the signatories were deceased.
He further alleged that he was denied fair hearing by both his constituents and INEC.
â€œThe petitioners ought to have informed Melaye of the facts and circumstances upon which the alleged loss of confidence was based prior to submission of the petition to INEC.
â€œINEC upon receipt of the said petition only served Melaye a mere notice that it had received a petition for his recall. So we are challenging INECâ€™s action.
â€œThey should have shown a copy of the petition to Melaye and failure to do so amounts to denial of fair hearing and a violation of the laws of natural justice.â€
Okoro also said his client was challenging the validity of the said petition on the grounds that the petition was based on political animosity, malice and bad faith.
He urged the court to grant the prayers of his motion and stop INEC from going ahead with the planned recall.
Counsel to the other plaintiffs in the matter said they aligned themselves with the arguments of Okoro.
Counsel to INEC, Anthony Adeniyi, on his part, said that Melaye had failed to show the court the particular signatories on the petition to which the death certificates attached as exhibit belonged.
â€œIf he attached death certificates, he should tell the court that this certificate for example, belongs to signature number 24 on the petition, but he failed to do that.â€
Justice Dimgba adjourned the matter until September 11 for judgment.
The judge also fixed September 11to deliver judgment in a suit filed by the All Progressives Congress (APC), seeking to stop Melayeâ€™s recall.
The judge consolidated the two suits to avoid having conflicting judgments since the subject of both suits were similar.